PDA

View Full Version : Denver Voters OK Marijuana Possession


007
11-02-2005, 03:09 PM
By JON SARCHE, Associated Press Writer


DENVER - Residents of the Mile High City have voted to legalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana for adults. Authorities, though, said state possession laws will be applied instead.

With 100 percent of precincts reporting early Wednesday, 54 percent, or 56,001 voters, cast ballots for the ordinance, while 46 percent, or 48,632 voters, voted against it.

Under the measure, residents over 21 years old could possess up to an ounce of marijuana.

"We educated voters about the facts that marijuana is less harmful to the user and society than alcohol," said Mason Tvert, campaign organizer for SAFER, or Safer Alternatives For Enjoyable Recreation. "To prohibit adults from making the rational, safer choice to use marijuana is bad public policy."

Bruce Mirken of the Washington, D.C.-based Marijuana Policy Project said he hoped the approval will launch a national trend toward legalizing a drug whose enforcement he said causes more problems than it cures.

Seattle, Oakland, Calif., and a few college towns already have laws making possession the lowest law enforcement priority.

The Denver proposal seemed to draw at least as much attention for supporters' campaign tactics as it did for the question of legalizing the drug.

Tvert argued that legalizing marijuana would reduce consumption of alcohol, which he said leads to higher rates of car accidents, domestic and street violence and crime.

The group criticized Mayor John Hickenlooper for opposing the proposal, noting his ownership of a popular brewpub. It also said recent violent crimes — including the shootings of four people last weekend — as a reason to legalize marijuana to steer people away from alcohol use.

Those tactics angered local officials and some voters. Opponents also said it made no sense to prevent prosecution by Denver authorities while marijuana charges are most often filed under state and federal law.

The measure would not affect the medical marijuana law voters approved in 2000. In June, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that medical marijuana laws in Colorado and nine other states would not protect licensed users from federal prosecution.

Also Tuesday, voters in the ski resort town of Telluride rejected a proposal to make possession of an ounce or less of marijuana by people 18 or older the town's lowest law enforcement priority. The measure was rejected on a vote of 308-332.

JVO
11-03-2005, 03:32 PM
I heard about this the other day. I know in many of the ski resort towns (Winter Park, Aspen, Vail etc.) these laws (or lack of laws) also exist. I know over the past 20 years Denver has had very relaxed drug laws. I have known a few people who got arrested for possesion and all they got was a ticket.

As far as the Federal laws not being affected, I think this is going to be the great debate of the next decade. It is only a matter of time before somebody get arrested by a state or federal law enforcement agency and appeals to the Supreme Court over who has jurisdiction. The problem is that there are so many senarios to contemplate. For instance, it would be great if the court said that States are allowed to make any laws they wish even if they are contrary to federal law (which is true in some instances). This would mean that any state could have any drug legislation they want (or don't want), or as we have seen recently legalize gay marriage, but what happens when southern states decide to make abortion illegal despite roe v. wade or mandate super tough drug legislation? Unfortunately, it seems to me that it has to be one way or the other. Another one of those issues that people are either for or against on specific issues but have no real philosophy to back it up with.

matty
11-03-2005, 05:52 PM
My favorite parts of that article are "Mile High City" and "Bruce Mirken." (For those of you who may not know, a mirken is a toupee for your dick.)

007
11-04-2005, 03:00 AM
'Dick Toupee'? What the Fuck?

Who the hell wants or needs that shit?

Diamond Vision
11-04-2005, 05:04 AM
heh heh.

Merkin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirkin)

heh heh. check it out.

matty
11-04-2005, 07:12 AM
:lmao:

There you have it.

007
11-04-2005, 01:36 PM
UGH!

:escape:
:scared:

larryhead
11-04-2005, 05:54 PM
Dick Toupee...

:lol:

Diamond Vision
11-04-2005, 06:42 PM
The Merkin Tee-Shirt (http://partybots.org/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=39&products_id=185)

Merkin quote from OED:
1714, "This put a strange Whim in his Head; which was, to get the hairy circle of her Merkin ... This he dry'd well and comb'd out, and then return'd to the Cardinal, telling him, he had brought Saint Peter's Beard."

The Modern Merkin (http://www.merkinworld.com/)

MigueL
12-02-2005, 12:33 AM
Ill have to say here is California the fuking police will give you a ticket for not using the crosswalk but growing selling smoking the ganga seems to be the least of there worries..........I mean J-walking that is a serious crime, one that should be enforced day or night and we the tax payers will support that shit.